Comments on: Shaky foundations exposed? http://www.nationaltrustpictures.com/2009/04/shaky-foundations-exposed/ Source legitimate stock shots of heritage property Fri, 29 May 2009 17:16:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: agallery http://www.nationaltrustpictures.com/2009/04/shaky-foundations-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-7 agallery Fri, 29 May 2009 17:16:18 +0000 http://www.nationaltrustpictures.com/?p=32#comment-7 One aspect of the Alamy ban on NT pictures that has not been explored is the point that if the threat from NT is tested in court and proved to have no legal foundation, Alamy would be open to legal action from contributers for the cost of the work to reinstate the photographs and for the lost revenue during the period that they were not available for sale. One aspect of the Alamy ban on NT pictures that has not been explored is the point that if the threat from NT is tested in court and proved to have no legal foundation, Alamy would be open to legal action from contributers for the cost of the work to reinstate the photographs and for the lost revenue during the period that they were not available for sale.

]]> By: andy mcinroy http://www.nationaltrustpictures.com/2009/04/shaky-foundations-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-4 andy mcinroy Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:44:46 +0000 http://www.nationaltrustpictures.com/?p=32#comment-4 It is clear that the NT are quoting these ancient bylaws out of context. Thank you for starting this webpage to draw attention to these issues. It is clear that the NT are quoting these ancient bylaws out of context.

Thank you for starting this webpage to draw attention to these issues.

]]>