NTPictures Forum » General Chat

Legal Position in Scotland

(2 posts)
  • Started 1 year ago by TheLifeOfBri
  • Latest reply from admin

Tags:

  1. Anyone any idea on the legal position of pictures taken on NT land in Scotland?

    We have been assured that pictures in England taken from Rights of Way are fine, but there is no directly similar concept in Scotland, where in effect the public have the right to roam pretty much anywhere.

    http://www.outdooraccess-scotland.com/upload/Full%20Access%20Code.pdf

    Recently I took some pictures while on local land owned by the National Trust. I did not park in their car park, there was no entrance fee, I did not pass any signs containing terms and conditions which I could be deemed to have accepted. I took some pictures (and walked my dogs) and left.

    The Outdoor Access Code specifically allows commercial photography:

    Section 2.9
    Access rights extend to activities carried out commercially or
    for profit, provided that these activities could also be carried on
    other than commercially or for profit (ie by the general public
    for recreational purposes or for educational activities or for
    crossing land). For example, a mountain guide who is taking a
    customer out hill-walking is carrying on a commercial activity
    but this falls within access rights because the activity involved
    – hill-walking – could be done by anyone else exercising access
    rights. The same would apply to a canoe instructor from a
    commercial outdoor pursuits centre with a party of canoeists.
    Other examples would be a commercial writer or photographer
    writing about or taking photographs of the natural or cultural
    heritage
    .

    Can therefore the NT have any legal leg to stand on if they attempted to prevent publication of such photos for editorial use?

    Cheers
    Bri.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  2. I think you provided your own answer - which is also, of course, the real answer to the whole NT issue. If what you are doing could be done by anyone, but you happen to be so good that people will pay you for the result, it really is not the Trust's business to attempt to restrict your civil rights to be recognised for your skill.

    It's interesting that they raise the issue of commercial writing, showing that whoever formulated this code had a clear perspective. I'd love to see the NT try to prevent words being published...

    It is good to know that Scotland (as in so many other small points of law) is a better place to be than England and Wales - I am not sure about Northern Ireland's situation.

    David

    Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.